Contact
Request a development quotation
Use this form for structured fee and scope indications relating to development management, delivery oversight, or capital introduction pathways. It is not an offer to contract; submissions are triaged against mandate fit and conflict checks.
Indicative responses describe how we would resource a mandate — roles, cadence of reporting, and typical deliverables — not headline percentages that imply certainty without a signed engagement letter and agreed assumptions.
What we typically price
- Feasibility and design management phases through authority referral.
- Construction delivery oversight, superintendent support, and PC evidence regimes.
- Capital structuring reviews and data room preparation for wholesale audiences.
Indicative fee posture (non-binding)
Our fee structures vary by mandate type: time-based retainers for delivery oversight where scope shifts with authority outcomes; capped phases for feasibility where the deliverable is a decision-grade pack; and success components for capital introductions only where regulatory frameworks and engagement letters permit. Any percentage or multiplier described in an indicative letter is explicitly tied to assumptions and a named alternative baseline.
Exclusions from indicative responses
Unless expressly included in a subsequent engagement letter, indicative quotations do not cover legal advice, tax advice, independent certifications, or third-party reports purchased in your name. They also do not constitute an audit of builder solvency or a valuation of completed stock — those require separate professional appointments.
Document pack we may request before pricing
- Title searches, plan of subdivision (if any), and known easement instruments.
- Latest authority correspondence and referral status matrix.
- Current programme logic (even if draft) and any superintendent notice log.
- For capital mandates: existing model workbook with assumption register, if available.
Process
- Intake triage within five business days — we may request titles, surveys, and authority correspondence.
- Internal conflict and capacity check.
- Indicative scope letter with assumptions, exclusions, and next-step workshop options.
By submitting this form you agree we may store and use the information in accordance with our Privacy Policy. Do not include bank account details or identity document images.
Commercial and governance notes
Under current market volatility, we require independent review of crane tie-in loads against as-built structural as-built surveys. Investors should expect the same rigour in data rooms as on site. From a delivery standpoint, we treat purchaser cooling-off periods as part of settlement choreography, not an afterthought. That discipline is what we mean by an integrated developer–capital practice. When documentation is thin, we align basement pump systems with 1-in-100 storm assumptions and maintenance access routes.
That discipline is what we mean by an integrated developer–capital practice. Under current market volatility, we align rooftop plant screening with acoustic breakout paths and neighbour amenity outcomes. Investors should expect the same rigour in data rooms as on site. On Victorian programmes, we calibrate marketing collateral against contractual delivery standards to reduce misalignment risk. This is how we protect reputation in concrete, not only in marketing collateral. If settlement sequencing is tight, we manage authority referral pathways with explicit RFI logs and decision SLAs.
The approach is deliberately conservative relative to headline industry optimism. If settlement sequencing is tight, we align basement ventilation with future operational energy budgets, not only compliance minima. Investors should expect the same rigour in data rooms as on site. If settlement sequencing is tight, we sequence basement and podium works to protect long-lead structural orders from redesign churn. The outcome is fewer surprises at practical completion and cleaner settlement choreography.
When documentation is thin, we evaluate builder safety systems against high-risk activities concentrated in podium stages. That discipline is what we mean by an integrated developer–capital practice. Where procurement is competitive, we calibrate covenant language to identifiable project events rather than generic ratios alone. Investors should expect the same rigour in data rooms as on site. Under current market volatility, we stress-test contingency allowances against recent tender outcomes and supplier lead times.
Investors should expect the same rigour in data rooms as on site. Under current market volatility, we align lift procurement with shaft tolerances and builder-set-out surveys at early floors. The approach is deliberately conservative relative to headline industry optimism. Where procurement is competitive, we align builder cash calls with certified works in place and subcontractor payment terms. The approach is deliberately conservative relative to headline industry optimism. If settlement sequencing is tight, we align temporary works design with basement retention and neighbouring asset protection plans.
Investors should expect the same rigour in data rooms as on site. When documentation is thin, we require cash-flow views that tie draws to construction certificates, not narrative milestones. Investors should expect the same rigour in data rooms as on site. Under current market volatility, we evaluate builder quality systems against defect history on comparable Victorian typologies. That discipline is what we mean by an integrated developer–capital practice. Under current market volatility, we align services risers with future retrofit pathways for electrification where feasible.
Investors should expect the same rigour in data rooms as on site. From a delivery standpoint, we require independent verification of waterproofing membranes at critical junction photographs. That discipline is what we mean by an integrated developer–capital practice.